History of Northstar engine

Aurora5000

New member
Joined
Apr 9, 2004
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
45
Northstar V8 Engine


The Northstar V8 engine family is General Motor's top-of-the-line luxury power plant. Introduced in 1993 in the Cadillac Allante, Eldorado and Seville STS, the 4.6L 32-valve dual overhead cam all-aluminum V8 engine was a quantum leap forward for U.S. automakers. Initially rated at 295 horsepower, the Northstar V8 has been ranked as one of the "10 Best Engines in North America" by Ward's Auto World. It also beat out both Mercedes-Benz and BMW in horsepower per liter of displacement, fuel economy and required maintenance.

Like most other engines, the Northstar V8 has evolved over the years. In 1994, the first Northstar V8 (L37) was joined by a second version (LD8) with a different cam profile that lowered peak horsepower slightly to 270 hp but increased torque output in the lower rpm range for improved throttle response and quick acceleration.

In 1994, a downsized and somewhat less powerful version of the original Northstar V8 was introduced in the Oldsmobile Aurora. The L47 4.0L V8 was essentially the same engine as the larger 4.6L V8 but with a smaller bore size (87mm vs. 93mm). The L47 4.0L V8 was rated at 250 horsepower.

In 1995, the power rating of the L37 4.6L V8 (VIN 9) was bumped up slightly to 300 hp, and the LD8 4.6L V8 (VIN Y) was upped to 275 hp.

The two basic versions of the 4.6L V8 (275 and 300 hp) are still being used in model year 2003, and there are no plans to replace this engine in the immediate future. So it looks like the Northstar V8 will continue to enjoy a long production run.

GM recently unveiled its Northstar XV12 concept engine that is physically about the same size as the existing V8 but is capable of producing up to 750 horsepower! The engine uses cylinder deactivation technology to keep fuel economy manageable, but there are no productions plans yet for this exotic power plant.

Engine Features
The Northstar V8 has a die-cast aluminum block with a bottom end girdle that splits along the midline of the crankshaft bearings. This takes the place of the main bearing caps. In model year 2000, GM began using a new high pressure "squeeze" casting process for the lower crankcase to reduce porosity in the aluminum, which may allow oil to seep through and leak (this has been a problem on some engines).


The cylinders have cast-in-place iron cylinder liners that are not replaceable. Compression up to model year 2000 was a relatively high 10.3:1. It was lowered to 10:1 in 2000. Each head has two camshafts (one intake, one exhaust) and four valves per cylinder (33mm intakes and 29mm exhausts). Direct-acting hydraulic lash adjusters are positioned over each valve. The overhead cams are all chain-driven, and use an intermediate chain sprocket under the front cover to connect to the crankshaft. Three separate hydraulic tensioners are used to keep the cam chains tight.

The Northstar V8 is an interference engine, which means if a chain fails or is disconnected when the engine is cranked over, the valves will hit the pistons. That's something you don't want to happen with an expensive engine like this!

The intake manifold is Nylon 66 thermoplastic, which helps cool intake air by conducting less heat from the engine. Fuel delivery is by sequential fuel injection with separate injectors mounted under the engine's top cover. Under the top cover you'll also find the MAP sensor, intake air temperature sensor and fuel pressure regulator.

If the fuel pump relay fails on a Northstar V8, the engine should still run because the fuel pump also can be energized through the oil pressure sending unit.

A four-coil distributorless ignition with a waste spark set up provides spark to the plugs. Two crankshaft position sensors are used plus a camshaft position sensor to provide timing inputs. Both crank sensors are mounted in the block and the cam sensor is located on the rear head in front of the exhaust cam. There's also a knock sensor on the rear head between cylinders 1 and 3 to retard timing if detonation becomes a problem under load.

The ignition system has two modes of operation: "module mode" and "ignition control mode." In ignition control mode, the PCM controls ignition timing using sensor inputs. If there's a problem in the PCM or with its sensor inputs, the module mode takes over and runs the engine with a fixed 10 degrees of advance. The engine continues to run (essentially a limp-in mode) but with reduced performance.


In model year 2000, the DIS ignition system was changed to a coil-on-plug design, which eliminates the spark plug wires and waste spark. Each head has its own ignition module that fits in the middle of the valve cover.

Another feature of the Northstar engines is a "limp home" mode that allows the engine to continue running if all the coolant is lost. If the PCM senses an overheating condition, it temporarily disables up to half of the cylinders. This pumps enough air though the engine to keep temperatures from getting hot enough to cause any damage. Even so, GM says the vehicle should not be driven more than 50 miles in the limp-home mode.
 
Thanks I have a few questions
A few occasion references have been made regarding a relationship to the Quad 4 but I believe this is incorrect and from this write up I see no mention fo a relationship. Was there one ?
I just wanted to confirm. Is the 4.0 just smaller bore? I would have thought they would have destroked instead to make a more compact engine.
 
Yes, it was de-bored, not de-stroked. This results in better torque than the shorter stroke would. Also, even if it were shorter in stroke, the external dimensions of the engine would be exactly the same. It wouldn't be more compact. They'd need to develop a whole new engine for that to happen.

I suspect there was some overlap or transferred knowledge from all the Quad-4 work. IIRC, the bore/stroke of the 4.6L V8 was similar/the same as the 2.3L I4. In addition, Olds messed around with a Quad 8 and some other stuff in the late 80's.
 
The Indy engine was a destroked 4 litre with a larger bore and shorter deck. This made me think the Aurora 4.0 may have had a different block and crank than the much larger 4.6 Then with the low slung Aurora hood drove me toward this shorter deck assumption as well. I need to find specs for the Caddy engines.

This is all I've ever seen. http://442.com/oldsfaq/ofeng.htm#Engines%2...5%20-%20Present I see now that I look the Aurora is a very square engine.
 
Awesome link Steve!

Gotta love this




The Aurora will have white diamond metallic paint with black and gold highlights (sounds like the performance colors of about 28 yrs. ago) with Indy 500 graphics. A power sunroof, 3.71:1 transaxle ratio (included with the Aurora's optional Autobahn package), chrome plated aluminum alloy wheels and Goodyear Eagle P235/60R16 tires rated for sustained 150 mph speed. The non-stock items that will be installed are those mandated by USAC which include a roll bar and a five-point safety harness for the driver and passenger.

To bad I dont get the 600+HP and 10500 rev limiter in my car :lol:

\/ nice!
 
Originally posted by razoredge@Apr 11 2004, 01:12 AM
The Indy engine was a destroked 4 litre with a larger bore and shorter deck. This made me think the Aurora 4.0 may have had a different block and crank than the much larger 4.6 Then with the low slung Aurora hood drove me toward this shorter deck assumption as well. I need to find specs for the Caddy engines.
Actually, it wasn't until 2000 that the Aurora IRL V8 was a destroked 4.0L engine. The original IRL V8 was 4.0L. That was the engine spec from 1997 through 1999. In 2000, IRL changed the spec to 3.5L. Olds introduced a kit to convert the existing blocks to 3.5L rather than redevelop a whole new engine (which was not necessary, and IRL was pretty tight on budgets back then). At that point it became a de-stroked 4.0L. This is also when Olds introduced a 180-degree crank for teams that were interested. I believe about half of them ran the 180-degree crank and about half stuck with the 90-degree one.

The Aurora IRL V8 has very little in common with our Aurora V8's... ;)

Also, the Aurora has a sloping hood because it's stylish, unlike the Caddy which just looks like an elegant box. ;)
 
I like the STS's and Eldorados but Im a Buick/Oldsmobile man by nature.

You better check the link I put above. It clearly shows the 4.0 IRL engine as a short stroke,large bore, low deck engine that could function up to 10,000. You could never get a "square" engine to live at that kind of RPM.

I just heard a few weeks ago they are now thinking of dropping to 3 litre to control track speeds. Thats what F1 runs = 3litre. "We've come a long ways Mister ;) " I remember the HUGE Offenheusers of the 60's when all you could see was engine and stacks behind the cockpit. Wonder what the displacement of those monsters was ?
 
Originally posted by razoredge@Apr 11 2004, 01:02 PM
You better check the link I put above. It clearly shows the 4.0 IRL engine as a short stroke,large bore, low deck engine that could function up to 10,000. You could never get a "square" engine to live at that kind of RPM.
Heh, I guess we just weren't on the same page... ;) I'm pretty familiar with the specs of the Aurora IRL V8. Yes, it has a wider bore and shorter stroke than the production Aurora V8. But you said it was de-stroked. That's not really true of the 4.0L IRL V8. That was the stroke it was designed for. It wasn't until 2000 that it got de-stroked.

Yeah, I've heard about the 3.0L thing. It is amazing the power modern powerplants produce.
 
Back
Top